Expectancy
Average R per trade: (win rate x avg win R) - (loss rate x avg loss R). Positive expectancy is the whole game.
### What the number actually is
Expectancy is the average result of one trade, repeated. FXStreet's trading learning center gives it as **(Average Profit x Win Rate) - (Average Loss x Loss Rate)**. Measure every outcome in R, units of the risk you had on at entry, and expectancy becomes the average R the system returns per trade. One number collapses how often you win and how much you win into the only quantity that compounds. The R-multiple framing was popularised by trading coach Van Tharp.
Work the example. A 40% win rate, winners averaging 3R, losers averaging 1R:
(0.40 x 3R) - (0.60 x 1R) = 1.2R - 0.6R = **+0.6R per trade**
Six tenths of one risk unit per trade, on average, across many trades. Over 100 trades that is +60R, and at 1% risk per trade +60R works out to 60% of starting equity before compounding. That is arithmetic on assumed inputs, not a forecast, and no system is owed those inputs. Notice what the calculation never asks for: being right often.
### Why it outranks every other stat
Win rate ignores size. Reward-to-risk ignores frequency. Profit factor hides how long it took. Expectancy is the only metric that survives being multiplied by *how often you trade*, which is what turns an edge into a result. Expectancy tells you the edge per trade. Expectancy times trade count tells you the edge per month. A +0.6R setup you can take twice a week and a +0.1R setup you can take twenty times a week are not the same business, and only expectancy plus frequency tells you which is which.
### Where people get it wrong
- **Measuring it on too few trades.** The standard error of a win rate over n trades is the square root of p(1-p)/n. At a true 40% win rate, twenty trades gives a standard error of roughly 11 percentage points, so a "measured" 40% is honestly consistent with 29% or 51%. At 100 trades that tightens to about 5 points. Your first twenty trades tell you almost nothing about your edge.
- **Quietly excluding trades.** The revenge trade counts. The "that wasn't really my setup" loss counts. An expectancy calculated on your best trades is not expectancy, it is a highlight reel.
- **Forgetting costs.** Spread, commission and slippage shave the winners and deepen the losers. Compute expectancy from filled prices, not from the plan you wrote before entry.
- **Expecting a smooth ride.** At a 40% win rate, the chance that any given run of five trades is five straight losses is 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.6, about 7.8%. Across a hundred trades, losing streaks are not a malfunction. They are the price of the +0.6R.
Track it, or you are guessing about the only thing that matters.
Related
Learn to actually use Expectancy.
Definitions are the easy part. The free first five modules put this on a real chart and make you do the work. No card required.